Sahashi's hand in running Nova into the ground is becoming clearer by the day. In part one of a three-part series,The Daily Yomiuri illustrates that even when he was about score with a tie up between Nova and Marui, he sabotaged the entire deal:
In a meeting held in late May in Tokyo, Nova's management was in the final stages of discussions over a capital and business tie-up with leading retailer Marui Co.
In return for Marui giving Nova a 6.6 billion yen capital injection, Nova would have given Marui exclusive rights to issue all loans taken out by its students. The deal would have included conditions favorable to allowing the four board members, including Sahashi, to stay in their posts.
But moments before an agreement was reached, Sahashi, 56, without giving a reason, asked for a little more time to consider the deal and walked out of the meeting. He could not be found for the next three days.
Sahashi's actions appalled Marui, which pulled the plug on discussions.
The former president's interference reportedly put an end to several more plans for tie-ups prepared by the board members, creating a widening gulf between Sahashi and the board.
How do you explain this? This was in May, before METI punished Nova and before Nova's financial situation took a dive off a cliff. We know that Nova was in the red the past two years, but the 6.6 billion yen deal with Marui and the others lined up by the board members could have saved Nova or at least lessened the impact of METI's six-month punishment. In concluding these deals, Nova may have also avoided the stock speculation that has raised so many eyebrows. But, for whatever reason, Sahashi chose to destroy the company. I wonder if he balked at the tie-up because he thought he wasn't getting a big enough slice of the pie? At least we now know why Rakuten and AEON are treating Nova like it's radioactive.
The end of the article shows Sahashi's arrogance and cowardice. The man wasn't listening to anybody:
However, it was the firm's area managers--executives in charge of groups of schools in each region--that sparked the board members' uprising.
The area managers handed a written petition to Sahashi in person on Aug. 17 demanding his resignation, and calling for the company to ensure Japanese staff and foreign instructors were paid on time.
The petition contained phrases such as, "We want Sahashi to step down to restore our corporate image."
The signatories also stated they would resign on Aug. 31 if Sahashi did not comply with their demands.
But even then, Sahashi is said to have offered little but excuses, making statements such as, "I'll have some good news for you in September," and "The company won't go under if we honor our debts."
The regional managers petitioned for Sahashi's resignation on five occasions, convinced the firm could not be rebuilt with him at the helm.
The board members and other executives contacted lawyers, the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., Nova's main bank, at the beginning of October to begin plans to oust Sahashi and to file for court protection.
Sahashi, an individualist who drove Nova to the top of the English conversation school market, is still in hiding.
"Ultimately, that man only ever thought of himself," one of Sahashi's aides commented.
Any takers on the next time we see Sahashi, he'll be in handcuffs?
ShareThis
LJ is currently using a spam filter, which may eat legitimate comments, particularly those containing URLs. If you are having trouble posting a comment, email LJ.
Comments
Nova shot itself in both feet
The board were increasingly disillusioned with Sahashi? The Area Managers threatened to resign? Sorry, but I see this as little more than PR and spin by the remaining bigwigs, at Nova, to make it look like they were always against Sahashi. Rubbish. Anders, and everyone with any position in the company were only too happy, for two decades plus, to do this idiot's bidding. If Nova starts up again, with these clowns at the helm, it will, for ordinary teachers, good and bad, still be the same contemptuous, exploitative gig that it increasingly became. They need people at the helm, who see TEFL as a real career, and recruit and train (and pay) teachers accordingly. Nice article, by the way.
Yours G of the Bang
The next time we see the
The next time we see the monkey he will likely be in handcuffs, or asking if you want your order "for here or take away?"
i need a no bullshit assesment...
today was a really shit day for me.
i feel angry sad and alone.
i dont know if i will get back pay or not.
i dont know if i will get unemployment.
what are most people you know doing?
are they staying or going?
no bullshit assessment
well bullshit or no bullshit, sounds like you need to find another job. There are many other jobs out there you can do on your Humanities visa, and not just sitting in a room bullshitting with people in broken english.
I wouldn't just sit around waiting for news on unemployment checks or reimbursement checks, cause the Ministry of Labor has 6,000 of those to go through. That could take months. It's not a matter of if you will get back pay or not, but when will you get back pay after all the paperwork goes through.
so it's easy to sit around and be angry & depressed, but just find another job. many of us could see this coming and many people failed to prepare for it.
You're wrong on the spin and
You're wrong on the spin and "happy to do his bidding". When the real story comes out, you will find that those directors spent years fighting Sahashi's madness on a lot of issues. He gave in one some (think how drug testing was never actually implemented) and over-ruled them on others.
They could have done more probably - and then been removed from the board. As many were over the years.
You're wrong on the spin...
No I'm not.
Drug testing was never implemented because it was illegal. What kind of fresh off the boat idiot do you take me for?
Another example - I always asked AAMs (many times) about the (obvious) reasons for the no socialization policy. Never got the same answer twice. A company teeming with Uriah Heeps - that's what made it work.
And that's a fact.
G of the Bang
"Drug testing was never
"Drug testing was never implemented because it was illegal."
It seems that a lot of Nova's policies were illegal (like the socialization policy you mention), but implemented anyways. Do you mean that just this one drug policy failed to get through because they decided it wasn't within the law? It seems like they would need a better reason than just a few laws to abandon any policy.
Comment viewing options
Post new comment
<blockquote>tags will be styled as a block that indicates a quotation.More information about formatting options