valve-bouncer wrote:Fuck me, I hope to christ you are a troll because the possibility of someone so mind-numbingly boring as you walking amongst us gives me the fear.


valve-bouncer wrote:Fuck me, I hope to christ you are a troll because the possibility of someone so mind-numbingly boring as you walking amongst us gives me the fear.

angryboy wrote:Sure thing mate.I`ll warn you though,it is a big thick hardback fucker so a bit hard to lug around.
I`ll give you his latest book of short stories too as I ended up with two.You can have that one but
the other is a boomerang,I always reread them.


valve-bouncer wrote:Fuck me, I hope to christ you are a troll because the possibility of someone so mind-numbingly boring as you walking amongst us gives me the fear.




lordCONAN wrote:After finishing the first book, I went back and watched the TV show again, and it's really amazing how much attention to detail they put into the show. There's so many things, that unless you're really looking out for them, will go straight past you.


SamhainP8 wrote:Just finished A Storm of Swords![]()
I read it as a 788 page PDF on an iPad but a bit of clickety clicking shows me the paper back is over 1500 pages and the ebook copies are around 1200 pages.....
What the???


SamhainP8 wrote:Just finished A Storm of Swords![]()
I read it as a 788 page PDF on an iPad but a bit of clickety clicking shows me the paper back is over 1500 pages and the ebook copies are around 1200 pages.....

Examination_Hell wrote:SamhainP8 wrote:Just finished A Storm of Swords![]()
I read it as a 788 page PDF on an iPad but a bit of clickety clicking shows me the paper back is over 1500 pages and the ebook copies are around 1200 pages.....
How did your eyes handle that?

Examination_Hell wrote:How did your eyes handle that?




steki47 wrote:I read the first two Dexter novels and generally found the TV series to be better. The author made some odd and bad choices with the storyline.

JD9 wrote:Not exactly on topic but it's the only book thread I could see.steki47 wrote:I read the first two Dexter novels and generally found the TV series to be better. The author made some odd and bad choices with the storyline.
I'm about halfway through the first book. Even after a couple of pages it was blazingly clear that TV Dexter and Book Dexter are very different beasts. That whole flirting back with LaGuerta thing and joking about marriage was nothing like TV Dexter at that stage of the game. So far it's been an OK read but yeah the TV show is heaps better. It reads like the writer had a great idea for a story but didn't have the writing skills to match. Parts can be annoying to read at times but I wonder if that's because I'm already very familiar with TV Dexter. Hard not to compare the 2 as you go I would think.

AsahiSupaSpy wrote:'Into Thin Air' John Krakauer


steki47 wrote:JD9 wrote:Not exactly on topic but it's the only book thread I could see.steki47 wrote:I read the first two Dexter novels and generally found the TV series to be better. The author made some odd and bad choices with the storyline.
I'm about halfway through the first book. Even after a couple of pages it was blazingly clear that TV Dexter and Book Dexter are very different beasts. That whole flirting back with LaGuerta thing and joking about marriage was nothing like TV Dexter at that stage of the game. So far it's been an OK read but yeah the TV show is heaps better. It reads like the writer had a great idea for a story but didn't have the writing skills to match. Parts can be annoying to read at times but I wonder if that's because I'm already very familiar with TV Dexter. Hard not to compare the 2 as you go I would think.
Ok, you see it, too. Weird, you usually expect the book to have more detail and character development. I stopped after the second novel but heard the third was horrible. The Amazon mob hated it.





wilde_oscar wrote:I recently finished "Deer Hunting with Jesus" where a lefty-leaning working-class American writer, Joe Bageant, attempts to expain, amongst other things, why the working-poor are attracted to the Republicans and hostile to the Democrats.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests